Selector parser with built in methods for working with selector strings.
With npm do:
npm install postcss-selector-parser
const parser = require('postcss-selector-parser');
const transform = selectors => {
selectors.walk(selector => {
// do something with the selector
console.log(String(selector))
});
};
const transformed = parser(transform).processSync('h1, h2, h3');To normalize selector whitespace:
const parser = require('postcss-selector-parser');
const normalized = parser().processSync('h1, h2, h3', {lossless: false});
// -> h1,h2,h3Async support is provided through parser.process and will resolve a Promise
with the resulting selector string.
Please see API.md.
The parser walks the selector AST recursively, both when parsing and when
serializing it back to a string (.toString()). In versions up to and
including 7.1.1, a selector with extreme nesting — for example thousands of
nested :not(...) — could recurse deeply enough to overflow the call stack and
throw RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded, a potential
denial-of-service when processing untrusted CSS.
This is now bounded by a maximum nesting depth (default: 256). Beyond that
depth, parsing and serialization throw a regular, catchable Error at a
predictable point instead of relying on the runtime hitting its stack limit.
The default is far above any realistic selector, so it does not affect normal
use.
Practical impact is low. The only attacker-controlled input is the selector
string itself, which is now capped by the default limit. The limit is
adjustable through the maxNestingDepth option, but that option is trusted
configuration provided by the integrating code — it is never derived from the
parsed CSS, so a malicious selector cannot change it:
// Tighten the limit when parsing untrusted input:
parser().processSync(untrustedSelector, {maxNestingDepth: 128});Raising maxNestingDepth to a very large value is an explicit, informed choice
and can reintroduce the stack-overflow risk in environments with a small call
stack (e.g. browser workers). The default is recommended unless you have a
specific need.
- Huge thanks to Andrey Sitnik (@ai) for work on PostCSS which helped accelerate this module's development.
MIT